Title agencies sit at one of the most data-sensitive intersections in financial services. Every transaction touches nonpublic personal information (NPI): Social Security numbers, bank account details, loan figures, and identity documents. That makes Pillar 3 of the ALTA Best Practices framework more than a compliance checkbox. It is a direct measure of whether your agency is operationally trustworthy to lenders, underwriters, and the consumers you serve.
ALTA’s Best Practices framework was developed to help title and settlement companies demonstrate that they handle sensitive data responsibly. Pillar 3 specifically requires agencies to adopt a written privacy and information security program designed to protect NPI. As lender audits intensify and regulators pay closer attention to third-party vendors in mortgage transactions, agencies that cannot demonstrate documented, tested, and current controls are losing business to those that can.
This checklist covers what auditors are looking for in 2026 and where agencies most commonly fall short.
What ALTA Pillar 3 Actually Requires
Pillar 3 is not prescriptive about specific technologies. It requires that your agency have a written information security program that is proportionate to your size, the sensitivity of the NPI you handle, and the risks you face. ALTA’s Pillar 3 Assessment Procedures provide assessors with a structured set of procedures for evaluating compliance. The core requirements break into five areas:
A formal, written information security policy
Designated responsibility for the program
Risk assessment processes
Technical and administrative safeguards proportionate to identified risks
Incident response and breach notification procedures
Where agencies stumble is not usually ignorance of these requirements. It is the gap between having a policy on paper and having controls that are actually implemented, monitored, and updated.
The Federal Backdrop: GLBA and the FTC Safeguards Rule
Pillar 3 does not exist in isolation. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, title and settlement companies are classified as financial institutions, which places them squarely under the FTC’s Safeguards Rule. The Rule’s major provisions took effect in June 2023, and they read almost identically to Pillar 3: designate a qualified individual to run the program, conduct and document a written risk assessment, enforce access controls and multi-factor authentication, encrypt customer information in transit and at rest, maintain a written incident response plan, oversee service providers, and test the program on a regular schedule.
The practical implication is straightforward. For a title agency, ALTA Pillar 3 readiness and FTC Safeguards Rule compliance are largely the same body of work. A gap in one is almost always a gap in the other. That reframes the stakes: a weak information security program is not only a lost lender relationship, but it is also a failure to meet a binding federal obligation enforced by the FTC.
The 2026 Audit Readiness Checklist
1. Written Information Security Policy (WISP)
Your agency has a current, dated WISP that specifically references NPI and the systems that store or transmit it.
The WISP has been reviewed and approved within the past 12 months.
The policy designates a named individual or role responsible for information security program oversight.
The WISP addresses remote work, mobile device use, and cloud storage, all of which assessors now treat as standard operating environments rather than edge cases.
Common gap: Policies written in 2020 or 2021 that have never been updated. Assessors look at policy revision dates. A stale policy signals a dormant program.
2. Risk Assessment
Your agency has conducted a documented risk assessment within the past 12 months.
The assessment covers the specific systems, applications, and third parties that access or process NPI.
Identified risks are tracked, prioritized, and tied to remediation actions with owners and target dates.
Wire fraud and business email compromise (BEC) are addressed explicitly. These are the dominant threat vectors for title agencies. In its 2025 Internet Crime Report, the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center recorded roughly $3.05 billion in BEC losses, ranking BEC the second-costliest cybercrime category for the year, and real estate transactions remain one of its primary targets. In one case cited in that report, parties closing on a home lost more than $449,000 to a wire diverted through an email impersonating their attorneys.
Common gap: Risk assessments that read like generic IT checklists, not documents grounded in the specific workflows of a title or settlement operation.
3. Access Controls
Access to NPI is limited to employees who require it to perform their job functions (least privilege).
User accounts are reviewed on a defined schedule (at minimum annually, preferably quarterly).
Former employees are removed from all systems within a documented, enforced offboarding timeline.
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is enforced on all systems that store, access, or transmit NPI, including email, title production software, and any cloud storage platforms.
Privileged access (admin accounts) is restricted and separately logged.
Assessors increasingly ask for evidence of access reviews, not just the policy that says they happen. Screenshots, export logs, and signed review records all qualify.
4. Data Encryption and Transmission Security
NPI transmitted electronically is encrypted in transit using current protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher).
NPI stored on servers, laptops, and portable media is encrypted at rest.
Your agency prohibits transmitting NPI via unencrypted email or consumer-grade file sharing platforms.
Any wire transfer instructions are verified through a secondary, out-of-band communication channel before funds are moved. This is both a Pillar 3 control and a direct defense against BEC fraud. The FBI reports that roughly 86 percent of BEC funds move by wire transfer or ACH, which makes out-of-band verification the single highest-leverage control an agency can enforce.
5. Vendor and Third-Party Management
Your agency maintains a current inventory of all third-party vendors that access NPI.
Vendor agreements include data security and confidentiality provisions.
High-risk vendors (title production platforms, cloud storage providers, IT managed service providers) have been assessed for their own security practices.
Your agency has a process for reviewing vendor security posture when contracts renew.
This is an area where many agencies are underprepared. Lenders auditing under ALTA Pillar 3 expect you to demonstrate that your vendors meet the same standards you do. If your IT provider cannot produce evidence of their own security program, that creates a gap in your audit response. Techvera’s Compliance Readiness services include vendor risk management documentation built specifically to support third-party assessments.
6. Employee Training and Awareness
All employees who handle NPI receive security awareness training at least annually.
Training covers phishing, wire fraud social engineering, and proper handling of NPI.
Training completion is documented with dates and employee names.
Your agency conducts phishing simulations or equivalent awareness exercises.
These attacks almost always reach an agency through a person, not a firewall: a compromised inbox or a convincing impersonation of a buyer, seller, or lender. Training is not a soft control. It is often the last line of defense before funds move.
7. Incident Response Plan
Your agency has a written incident response plan (IRP) that addresses data breaches involving NPI.
The IRP defines roles and responsibilities, escalation paths, and external notification contacts (underwriters, lenders, regulators, affected consumers).
The plan has been tested within the past 12 months, either through a tabletop exercise or a documented review.
Breach notification timelines are defined and consistent with applicable state laws and GLBA requirements.
Assessors distinguish between agencies that have a plan and agencies that have tested a plan. A plan that has never been exercised is a document. A tested plan is a capability.
8. Physical Security
Physical access to servers, workstations, and paper records containing NPI is controlled and logged.
Workstations are configured to lock after a defined period of inactivity.
Document disposal procedures (cross-cut shredding, secure destruction services) are defined and followed for physical NPI.
9. Network Security
Your agency uses a business-grade firewall with active monitoring or management.
Guest Wi-Fi networks are isolated from the internal network used to access NPI.
Endpoint protection (antivirus, EDR) is deployed and current on all devices that access NPI.
Security patches are applied on a defined schedule. Unpatched systems are one of the most commonly cited findings in assessor reports.
Techvera’s Network Support and Cybersecurity services provide the underlying technical controls that satisfy these requirements, with documentation designed to support third-party assessments.
10. Program Documentation and Evidence
This is where well-intentioned agencies lose audits. The controls above need to exist. But they also need to be documented in a way an assessor can verify.
Your agency maintains an evidence library: policy documents, access review records, training logs, risk assessment reports, vendor agreements, incident response test results.
Documents are versioned and dated.
Your designated program owner can produce requested evidence within a reasonable timeframe.
Assessors do not accept verbal descriptions of controls. If it is not documented, it did not happen.
The Lender Audit Context
Lenders increasingly require ALTA Best Practices assessments as a condition of doing business. Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and major bank lenders have all raised expectations for third-party settlement service providers in recent years. A Pillar 3 gap does not just create regulatory exposure. It creates a business development problem when a lender puts your agency on hold pending remediation.
The agencies that move through audits efficiently are the ones that treat their information security program as a standing operational function, not a project that spins up when an audit is scheduled. That requires the right internal processes, the right technology controls, and often the right outside IT partner to provide both the technical depth and the compliance documentation infrastructure.
Where to Start
If your agency is approaching an ALTA assessment or has received a lender questionnaire, the gap analysis step is the most valuable hour you can spend before anything else. Understanding specifically where your current program deviates from Pillar 3 requirements lets you prioritize remediation rather than rebuild everything from scratch.
Techvera works with title and settlement companies to conduct compliance gap assessments, implement the technical controls required under Pillar 3, and build the documentation libraries that hold up under assessor review. Our vCIO Services give smaller agencies access to the strategic IT guidance that larger firms have in-house, without the overhead of a full-time hire.
If you are preparing for a Pillar 3 assessment or want to understand where your program stands today, schedule a no-obligation, 30-minute compliance strategy session with our team.
About the Author
Team Techvera
Techvera Team
Articles written collaboratively by the Techvera team, combining expertise across cybersecurity, managed services, and digital transformation.